Maintainer or QZ
The short answer: if the car sits in a garage with a socket and you are nearby, a battery maintainer is the cheaper and better choice. QZ is worth it where a charger can't reach — or when you want to know whether it is really charging.
| Battery maintainer | QZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Charges the battery | yes | no — it measures and alerts |
| Needs a socket | yes | no, it runs off the battery |
| Where you see the state | at the car; some models in an app over Bluetooth when you are close | on your phone from anywhere, over 4G |
| Speaks up on its own | no | yes, when the data shows growing risk |
| Draw from the battery | — | about 6 mA, ≈ 0.14 Ah a day |
| Price | one-off, typically tens of euros | 199 € including the first year, then 49 €/year |
Battery voltage at night (2:00 – 5:00, vehicle parked) — measured directly at the battery every 10 minutes. Only nights with a clean reading are shown.
The voltage fell from 12.73 V to 12.48 V — steadily, about 14 mV a day. On a battery this small, QZ itself is a real part of the draw: about 6 mA, roughly 1 % of the capacity a day. Verdict: a motorcycle that stands over winter belongs on a maintainer. QZ does not replace it — it can only remind you in time that it is time to plug it in.
The car is driven irregularly. On parked days the voltage falls by 2 to 5 hundredths of a volt a day and a drive brings it back. On 13–14 September it was on a charger (13.30 V at night). On 25 August, during a workshop visit, it dropped to 12.27 V — well below this battery's healthy band. Verdict: a car that is driven regularly does not need a maintainer. QZ shows whether the drives really recharge the battery, and speaks up when they don't.
To be clear: QZ does not charge and does not measure capacity or cranking current — a workshop tester does that. QZ follows how the battery behaves in real life and alerts you when it is getting worse.